IP Publishing logo IP Publishing Ltd
Outlook On Agriculture Logo

The international journal devoted to agricultural science, policy and strategy.


Editor: Dr David Lister

Incoming Editor: Professor Neville G. Gregory

This journal is covered by Thomson Reuters ISI.

Recommend this journal to your library

Editorial coverage

Outlook on Agriculture, published quarterly, provides analysis, reviews and commentary for an international and interdisciplinary readership. Special attention is paid to agricultural policy, international trade in the agricultural sector, strategic developments in food production, the role of agriculture in social and economic development, agriculture in developing countries, and environmental issues. Further details are available at www.ippublishing.com. Articles should be in the region of 4,000 words. Submissions of research notes and shorter pieces will also be welcome.

Submissions - Notes for authors

Please send all submissions to Dr David Lister, c/o Outlook on Agriculture, IP Publishing Ltd, 258 Belsize Road, London NW6 4BT, UK. Dr Lister may also be contacted by e-mail at outlookonagric(at)btinternet.com or on tel +44 560 248 8726

Length and presentation of contributions

Articles should be in the region of 4,000 words. Research notes and shorter pieces will also be considered for publication. In addition, papers derived from work done under the EU Research Framework Programme will be readily considered. Submissions should be double-spaced, printed on one side of the paper, and sent in triplicate. Authors should supply a floppy disk, specifying the software used, and taking care that the disk version is exactly the same as the hard copy supplied.

The text should be ordered under appropriate sub-headings (not numbered paragraphs or sections) and where possible these should not be more than 800 words apart. Three levels of sub-heading are possible.

The title page should show the names and addresses of the authors, their professional status and affiliation and the address (including e-mail) to which correspondence should be sent. As this page will not be sent to referees, the title of the article (without author names) should be repeated on the first text page.

An abstract should be provided, comprising 80-100 words.

Between 3 and 6 keywords should appear below the abstract, highlighting the main topics of the paper. References should follow the Harvard system. That is, they should be shown within the text as the author's surname (or authors' surnames) followed by a comma and the year of publication, all in round brackets: for example, (Smith, 1998). At the end of the article a bibliographical list should be supplied, organized alphabetically by author (surnames followed by initials - all authors should be named). Bibliographic information should be given in the order indicated by the following examples: 

  • Articles: Maskey, R. (2001), 'Population growth and food production: issues, problems and prospects', Outlook on Agriculture, Vol 30, No 3, pp 155–160.
  • Books: Henry, J.G., and Heinke, G.W., eds (1989), Environmental Science and Engineering, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Notes should be numbered consecutively in the text and typed in plain text at the end of the paper (not as footnotes on text pages).

Tables should be reduced to the simplest form and present only essential data. They should be submitted on separate sheets at the end of the article. The use of vertical rules in tables should be avoided.

For illustrations, line drawings and black and white photographs are acceptable. Authors are asked to supply originals of line drawings for reproduction. Photographs should be glossy prints with good contrast.

Prior Publication

Articles are received on the understanding that they are original contributions, and have not been published officially, either in print or electronic form, or submitted for publication elsewhere. In this respect, ‘discussion’ or ‘working’ papers, conference presentations and proceedings are not considered to be official publications, unless they have been formally deemed so by conference organizers, or presented as edited works through recognized publishing channels. If in doubt, authors are asked to draw the attention of the Editor to any prior dissemination of the paper in their letter of submission.

Refereeing

Other than research notes, reports, and personal opinion pieces, articles will be refereed. Papers by authors who are not academics (eg submissions from industry) will also be subject to review before acceptance, but their distinct nature and aims will be fully taken into account.

Copyright

Unless otherwise indicated, submissions are received on the understanding that they are original contributions,, and have not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere. The editor reserves the right to edit or otherwise alter contributions, but authors will see proofs before publication. Authors will be asked to assign copyright, where possible, to IP Publishing Ltd. Relevant authors’ rights are protected.

Editorial Board

  • Editor: Dr David Lister, c/o IP Publishing Ltd, 258 Belsize Road, London NW6 4BT, UK. E-mail: outlookonagric(a)btinternet.com
  • Incoming Editor: Professor Neville G. Gregory,
    Royal Veterinary College, London, UK.
    E-mail: ngregory(a)rvc.ac.uk

Editorial Advisory Board

  • Professor P.K. Aggarwal
    Indian Agricultural Research Institute, India
  • Dr Simon Anderson
    International Institute for Environment and Development, UK
  • Dr Loek Boonekamp
    Paris, France
  • Professor Deng Xi-Ping
    Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
  • Dr C. Devendra
    Consulting Tropical Animal Production Specialist, Malaysia
  • Dr Polly Ericksen
    International Livestock Research Institute, Kenya
  • Dr R. C. Hardwick
    Brussels, Belgium
  • Dr Alfred Hartemink
    ISRIC - World Soil Information
    The Netherlands
  • Hsin Huang
    OECD, France
  • Professor M.G.K. Jones
    State Agricultural Biotechnology Centre, Murdoch University, Western Australia
  • Dr Jill M. Lenné,
    Consulting Tropical Agriculture Specialist, Fyvie, UK
  • Professor Alan Malcolm
    Decibell Communications, London, UK
  • Dr Antoinette Mannion
    Department of Geography, University of Reading, UK
  • Professor Graham Matthews
    Imperial College London, UK
  • Dr S.D. Morgan Jones
    Director, Lethbridge Research Centre, Canada
  • Dr Sushil Pandey
    International Rice Research Institute, The Philippines
  • Dr Thomas Fitz Randolph
    International Livestock Research Institute, Kenya
  • Dr Fabrice Renaud
    United Nations University Institute for Environment and Human Security (UNU-EHS), Germany
  • Dr J. Sumberg
    Institute of Development Studies, UK
  • Professor Guido van Huylenbroeck
    Department of Agricultural Economics, Ghent University, Belgium
  • Professor J. Van Staden
    Research Centre for Plant Growth & Development, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

JUNE 2010 ISSUE (VOL 39, NO 2)

76 Editorial

79 We know where the shoe pinches: a case study-based analysis of the social benefits of pesticides

Ben Bennett, Jerry Cooper and Hans Dobson

89 Cassava mosaic disease in Sub-Saharan Africa: a feasible solution for an unsolved problem

A.G.O. Dixon, F.O. Ogbe and R.U. Okechukwu

95 Surface run-off water quality from agricultural lands and residential areas

D.D. Poudel, C.Y. Jeong and A. DeRamus

107 Agro-environmental project duration and effectiveness in South-east Asia

M. Subedi, M.A. Fullen, T.J. Hocking, A.R. McCrea and E. Milne

115 Recent concerns about the environment in Bangladesh

Neville G. Gregory, Paritosh K. Biswas and Shafique H. Chowdhury

121 Assessing the impact of adaptive agricultural research on accelerating technology deployment: the case of zero tillage wheat in India

Olaf Erenstein and Vijay Laxmi

127 The effect of government expenditure on promoting livestock GDP and reducing rural poverty in India

M.B. Dastagiri

134 Adoption of dairy production technologies and implications for dairy development in India

V.K. Basunathe, S.W. Sawarkar and P.V.K. Sasidhar

141 Livelihood diversification and the expansion of artisanal mining in rural Tanzania: drivers and policy implications

Beatrice Kwai and Gavin Hilson

149 Registration of cooperatives with government in Enugu state, Nigeria: what difference does it really make?

Anselm A. Enete

Back to Top

Title: We know where the shoe pinches: a case study-based analysis of the social benefits of pesticides

Author(s): Ben Bennett, Jerry Cooper and Hans Dobson

Abstract: Most published material relating to pesticides focuses on negative effects. Previous work by the authors has linked pesticides to a range of benefits, but not to wider social outcomes. In this study, a case is made that, if used properly, pesticides can result in a range of social benefits. To characterize social outcomes for individuals, families, other groups and communities, the authors undertook the development of an analytical framework to categorize the potential outcomes, a review of the literature and an examination of specific cases in production systems using pesticides. Four categories of use were explored: livestock disease vector control, subsistence farming, transition from subsistence to cash crop farming and commercial farming. The last two showed very strong positive associations, with benefits being manifested in increased income and reduced risk, plus the ability to hire labour and provide employment opportunities. Other outcomes were the evolution of more complex community facilities, such as schools and shops, and improved health. One unexpected finding was that there appeared to be an association between the use of pesticides and cooperation (that is, farmers working together in purchasing, spraying and/or marketing). Many of the case studies supported the hypothesis that farm businesses using pesticides were associated with the development of administrative skills that spilled over into other aspects of people’s lives. Although the sample was small and there was a risk of an inherent bias towards those with a vested interest in maintaining their current farming systems (including pesticides), these case studies support the authors’ hypothesis that there are social benefits from pesticide use.

Back to Top

Title: Cassava mosaic disease in Sub-Saharan Africa: a feasible solution for an unsolved problem

Author(s): A.G.O. Dixon, F.O. Ogbe and R.U. Okechukwu

Abstract: Cassava mosaic disease (CMD) is a widespread viral disease that causes high yield losses in susceptible genotypes in Sub-Saharan Africa. Effective control of CMD is beneficial and justifiable since cassava is an important source of carbohydrates for over 200 million people in most African countries where the crop is grown. Despite much research effort, CMD has not been completely brought under control, and this remains a tremendous challenge to scientists and other stakeholders. This paper highlights and discusses some of the challenges in controlling CMD and offers some solutions. The need to diversify cassava utilization as food, feed and industrial raw material is crucial for the commercialization of the crop, and this diversification will eventually lead to farmers making extensive use of improved CMD-resistant genotypes and other inputs.

Back to Top

Title: Surface run-off water quality from agricultural lands and residential areas

Author(s): D.D. Poudel, C.Y. Jeong and A. DeRamus

Abstract: This study was conducted to characterize surface run-off water quality from sugar cane fields, pasturelands and residential areas, and to assess the effectiveness of best management practices (BMPs) in controlling non-point source pollution. From October 2002 to September 2005, the five-day biological oxygen demand (BOD5), total suspended solids (TSS), nitrate/nitrite-N (NO3/NO2-N), soluble reactive phosphate (SRP), total phosphorus (TP), total nitrogen (TN) and pH were determined in surface run-off water from two sugar cane fields, two pasturelands and two residential areas in south- western Louisiana. Faecal coliform counts were carried out on run-off samples from the two pasturelands. The BMPs implemented in one of the sugar cane fields included drop-pipe structures, nutrient management, reduced tillage and the application of herbicides to eliminate summer cultivations, while those implemented in one of the pasturelands included drop-pipe structures, cross- fencing, water points, nutrient management, improved forage planting and managed rotational grazing. Average TSS concentration in surface run-off from the sugar cane fields was significantly higher than the average TSS concentration in the surface run-off from the pastureland and residential areas. Average BOD5 concentrations in surface run-off from the sugar cane fields and pasturelands were significantly higher than the average BOD5 concentration in surface run-off from the residential site. Average TN and NO3/NO2-N concentrations in surface run-off from the sugar cane fields were significantly higher than the average concentration for the pasturelands and residential areas surface run-off. Average TP and SRP concentrations in surface run-off from the pasturelands were significantly higher than the average TP and SRP concentrations in surface run-off from the sugar cane fields and residential areas. The BOD5 was significantly positively correlated with TSS, TN, TP, SRP and NO3/NO2-N. Surface run-off from the sugar cane field with BMPs showed relatively lower median values of TN, TP, NO3/NO2-N and SRP and a slightly higher BOD5 value than the surface run-off from the sugar cane field without BMPs. Similarly, the surface run-off from pastureland with BMPs showed lower median values for TSS, TN and NO3/NO2-N than the surface run-off from pastureland without BMPs.

Back to Top

Title: Agro-environmental project duration and effectiveness in South-east Asia

Author(s): M. Subedi, M.A. Fullen, T.J. Hocking, A.R. McCrea and E. Milne

Abstract: Considerable emphasis has been placed on developing technologies for agricultural sustainability. Many bilateral projects are working to achieve this outcome. A desk review was conducted to study the importance of project duration for the effectiveness of sustainable agricultural projects. Longer-duration projects were successful in addressing more holistic issues than short projects. However, funding agencies tend to fund shorter-duration projects, so projects become progressively shorter. At the same time, the number of projects implemented each year is increasing. Despite the decrease in total development assistance, increases in project numbers, particularly since 1986, appear to be at the cost of project duration. Short project duration was one of the most cited reasons for not completing essential dissemination activities for wider adoption, whereas longer- duration projects were usually considered more successful in addressing more holistic issues. It is difficult to produce tangible outputs from agricultural and soil conservation projects within five years. Considering the slow changes in the system and in agricultural and environmental sustainability, the authors suggest that project developers should be advised to plan for a minimum of 5–10 years, depending on the nature of activities. It is time for funding agencies to reconsider their tendency to fund shorter-duration projects.

Back to Top

Title: Recent concerns about the environment in Bangladesh

Author(s): Neville G. Gregory, Paritosh K. Biswas and Shafique H. Chowdhury

Abstract: Bangladesh is one of the poorest countries in the world and is affected by natural disasters, pollution and a range of public health hazards. The country’s main environmental constraints are its susceptibility to seasonal flooding, inadequate sanitation and its limited infrastructure for wastewater management. Conversion of the Sundarbans to shrimp ponds and rice paddies has reduced the protection provided by this coastal strip. This, along with sedimentation in the western delta region, has increased the flood risk. High river flow rates during the monsoon in the centre and east of the Bay of Bengal are a threat to human and animal safety. Difficulties with installing and maintaining sanitation networks in flood-prone regions are causing pollution problems, and this has become more evident from recent reports about antibiotic-resistant strains of enteric pathogens in coastal shrimps and prawns. Pollution with sewage and wastewaters from the shrimp farming and leather industries are contributing to poor water quality in the rivers and delta. Difficulties in achieving immediate and adequate surveillance during the 2007 avian influenza outbreak may have compromised control standards for this disease. This article gives an overview of these and other environmental and health issues affecting the country.

Back to Top

Title: Assessing the impact of adaptive agricultural research on accelerating technology deployment: the case of zero tillage wheat in India

Author(s): Olaf Erenstein and Vijay Laxmi

Abstract: A critical assumption in the impact assessment of an agricultural R&D effort is whether the effort in question has a substitute – that is, whether the innovation would also happen under other settings. This paper takes the case of zero tillage wheat in India to explore diverging counterfactual scenarios whereby, in the ‘without’ case, the innovation would not have been introduced or would have been introduced only with a ten-year or five-year lag. The authors quantify how the assumed counterfactual scenario affects various impact assessment indicators. They show that, even when assuming a conservative five-year lag and based on induced supply-shift gains alone, the investment in zero tillage R&D by the international agricultural research system was highly beneficial. The ability of zero tillage to combine cost savings and yield gains, its wide applicability and significant R&D spill-ins contributed to the high returns. The case thus highlights the high potential gains from successful adaptive research, even if the main effect is only to accelerate technology deployment.

Back to Top

Title: The effect of government expenditure on promoting livestock GDP and reducing rural poverty in India

Author(s): M.B. Dastagiri

Abstract: India’s livestock sector is growing and is playing a vital role in the continent’s agricultural economy. The 11th Plan and the National Agricultural Policy have focused on livestock to achieve the target growth rate of 4% in the agricultural sector. However, there has been a decline in public investment in both agriculture and livestock. There is a notion that livestock is a neglected sector in terms of investment, and the distribution of investment is also skewed. This paper looks at the status, growth rates and trends of government spending on animal husbandry and dairy, livestock gross domestic product (GDP), investments in agriculture, agricultural GDP and national GDP. The author assesses the effects of government spending on livestock for promoting livestock GDP and reducing poverty, and suggests policy measures to promote investment in the livestock sector.

Back to Top

Title: Adoption of dairy production technologies and implications for dairy development in India

Author(s): V.K. Basunathe, S.W. Sawarkar and P.V.K. Sasidhar

Abstract: This paper describes the uptake of five dairy production technologies – artificial insemination, deworming, vaccination, concentrate feeding and mineral mixture feeding – in the Nagpur district of India’s Vidarbha region. The survey was carried out in 21 villages and data were collected from 210 dairy farmers. The major reasons for the non-adoption or discontinuation of these technologies were: non-availability of service; lack of knowledge among farmers; and withdrawal of free/subsidized services by government. The implications for dairy development are discussed.

Back to Top

Title: Livelihood diversification and the expansion of artisanal mining in rural Tanzania: drivers and policy implications

Author(s): Beatrice Kwai and Gavin Hilson

Abstract: This paper provides an extended analysis of livelihood diversification in rural Tanzania, with special emphasis on artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM). Over the past decade, this sector of industry, which is labour-intensive and comprises an array of rudimentary and semi-mechanized operations, has become an indispensable economic activity throughout Sub-Saharan Africa, providing employment to a host of redundant public sector workers, retrenched large-scale mine labourers and poor farmers. In many of the region’s rural areas, it is overtaking subsistence agriculture as the primary industry. Such a pattern appears to be unfolding within the Morogoro and Mbeya regions of southern Tanzania, where findings from recent research suggest that a growing number of smallholder farmers are turning to ASM for employment and financial support. It is imperative that national rural development programmes take this trend into account and provide support to these people.

Back to Top

Title: Registration of cooperatives with government in Enugu state, Nigeria: what difference does it really make?

Author(s): Anselm A. Enete

Abstract: The cooperative has long been recognized by governments as a vehicle for poverty reduction. In Nigeria, however, the term ‘cooperative’ has traditionally been restricted to those organizations registered with government. This leads to an underestimation of the contribution of cooperatives to society because the activities of non-registered organizations with cooperative characteristics go unnoticed. This paper compares registered and non-registered cooperatives in Nsukka to ascertain whether registration really makes a difference. The analysis shows that membership of both registered and non-registered societies is dominated by men. However, the non-registered societies are, on average, younger (in terms of both membership and date of establishment) than the registered group. The non-registered societies are also much smaller than the registered ones. While the non-registered societies source their credit from the informal sector, their registered counterparts source theirs from government and the formal sector, essentially because government does not recognize non-registered societies as cooperatives. Although both the amount and spread of investment are significantly higher among the non-registered cooperatives than the registered ones, there is no significant difference between the two groups in terms of income earned. This is apparently due to government support of the registered cooperatives, which props up their income. In addition, the non-registered societies are more oriented towards community development in their investment. Thus, neglecting the activities of non- registered groups may not only be detrimental to development, but may also be disadvantageous to poverty alleviation programmes. This is particularly important for the international development/donor agencies and NGOs with a special focus on cooperatives or similar groups.

Back to Top

Copyright 2010 IP Publishing Ltd.